Blood On Their Hands
The misguided, irresponsible and dangerous response to the Jordan Neely tragedy
In 1919, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote an opinion on behalf of a unanimous Supreme Court, finding that the Constitution's First Amendment does not, in fact, provide an all-encompassing protection of speech.
To illustrate his point, Holmes used a hypothetical example, writing, "(Even) the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a …
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Danger Close with Brian O'Leary to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.



